Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

write ONE critical evaluation of Schittekatte, M. (1996). Facilitating information exchange in small decision-making groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 537-556. using the template provided further on in this document.

Project description
write ONE critical evaluation of Schittekatte, M. (1996). Facilitating information exchange in small decision-making groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 537-556. using the template provided further on in this document.

sessment criteria

1. There is an accurate, original, description of the published experiments method and results. =10 marks

2. There is quality critical evaluation of the published experiments method and results using logic and synthesis. The critical evaluation extrapolates strengths and/or weaknesses of the target article =20 marks

3. There is quality critical evaluation of the published experiments method and results using substantiated knowledge (that is, accompanied by citations). The citations demonstrate the ability to accurately interpret published evidence and to compare/contrast it with the target article. The citations were selected from PsycINFO search results; the PsycINFO search parameters were stipulated in the original assessment brief. The critical evaluation extrapolates strengths and/or weaknesses of the target article.=20 marks

4. The citations were found through PsycINFO using the PsycINFO search parameter indicated in the assessment brief later on in this document. The citations are relevant and accompanied by a reference list.=5 marks*

5. The work has demonstrated the writers ability to engage in an intellectual debate in an objective manner that adheres to the principles of science. =15 marks

6. The work adheres to the critical evaluation template provided; the word counts, structure, content (maximum 1,000 words overall, excluding the reference list) and other aspects follow the formatting instructions.=7 marks*

7. The citations and references adhere to the American Psychological Association (APA) format. In addition, each reference to a journal article contains the DOI locator. =8 marks*

8. The writing has clarity and precision. = 5 marks*
———-
Added on 20.05.2016 18:50
DOCUMENT: CONTENTSERVER = MAIN SOURCE FOR CRITICAL EVALUATION
BULLET POINT 3: CONTENT SERVER 2 = FOR COMPARISON
BULLET POINT 3: PERS SOC= FOR COMPARISON
Instruction files

contentserver.asp.pdf(712,10 KiB)
File uploaded by writer

1468079.doc (48,00 KiB)
Uploaded on 22-05-2016, 21:33


Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min