Order Description
Task 3 – Assignment 3 Weight Due date Linked unit outcomes Linked graduate capabilities
Critical evaluation of whether or not the program identified in Assignment 2 can/should be introduced into the Australian jurisdiction identified in Assignment 1.
Word Limit: 2000 words 40% 1,2,3,4,5,6 1,2,3,4,5,6
Assignment 3
40% Critical Evaluation
Provide a critical analysis of the prospects for success or failure regarding the transfer of your preferred program to your Australian jurisdiction.
Now that you have (a) identified a specific policy/program in an Australian jurisdiction (Assignment 1) and (b) chosen a particular program from a different jurisdiction because it seems to be a promising candidate for borrowing (Assignment 2), the final assignment considers the feasibility of actually borrowing the program and having it ‘work’.
This assignment requires you to critically examine the ‘receiving’ political arena in Australia. You should address, at a minimum:
1. A statement of the benefits which will accrue if the borrowed program can be transferred successfully into the relevant Australian jurisdiction.
2. A critical analysis of the major differences between the ‘exporting’ jurisdiction – i.e. the jurisdiction from which the program will be borrowed – and the Australian jurisdiction into which the program will be transferred.
3.Read the Case Study- Accident on the Job.pdf (ATTACHED TO THIS ORDER) and analyze it using the framework provided by the TGS Critical Thinking Rubric. Use the rubric’s four key steps as the format framework of a short position paper (details in the “Deliverables” section below).
4. A critical analysis of the ways in which the program needs to be ‘tied into’ or ‘hooked up’ to the existing institutional arrangements in the Australian jurisdiction.
5. A critical analysis of the politics of transferring the program: which individuals and groups might support it and which might oppose it and why? what are costs, and upon whom are these likely to fall?
6. Your recommendation whether the relevant jurisdiction should proceed with the program transfer and reasons for your recommendation.
Note: You should consider the option of recommending that there should not be a transfer as well as the option of recommending that there should be a transfer.
IMPORTANT: The 3 assessment tasks articulate with one other. Please consider the requirements of Assignments 2 and 3 when you are working through the requirements for Assignment 1. You will need to choose your research area (Assignment 1) wisely to ensure enough comparative material exists in other jurisdictions to enable you to complete Assignments 2 and 3. If you are in any doubt about choosing your research area, please consult the Unit Convenor.
Now please focus for Assignment 3 (Critical Evaluation )
Critical evaluation of whether or not the program identified in Assignment 2 can/should be introduced into the Australian jurisdiction identified in Assignment 1.
i send 3 file :
file 1- detail and outline unit
2- first my research (Assignment On: Critical analysis of one policy area) –
3- second my research you work already ( Assignment Two: Critical comparative analysis of affordable housing policy for young people)
Number of sources/reference 17-18
focus more this very very important
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order
