Several committee members have brought studies for review. Each member feels the articles they brought are good because they were published in current respected peer reviewed clinical journals or have been retrieved from clinical practice guidelines.
What are some of the criteria or key elements that you as the committee leader should consider when reviewing the submissions for developing clinical practice changes?
What implementation tools may assist you, as the committee leader,, in determining if a study, even one with adequate evidence, provides for a practical transition from research to practice?
Describe some common errors, or pitfalls, that must be avoided when transitioning evidence to practice and some reliable methods for avoidance?

Order Management

Premium Service
- 100% Custom papers
- Any delivery date
- 100% Confidentiality
- 24/7 Customer support
- The finest writers & editors
- No hidden charges
- No resale promise
Format and Features
- Approx. 275 words / page
- All paper formats (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian)
- Font: 12 point Arial/Times New Roman
- Double and single spacing
- FREE bibliography page
- FREE title page
0% Plagiarism
We take all due measures in order to avoid plagiarisms in papers. We have strict fines policy towards those writers who use plagiarisms and members of QAD make sure that papers are original.