What are some of the criteria or key elements that you as the committee leader should consider when reviewing the submissions for developing clinical practice changes?

Several committee members have brought studies for review. Each member feels the articles they brought are good because they were published in current respected peer reviewed clinical journals or have been retrieved from clinical practice guidelines.

What are some of the criteria or key elements that you as the committee leader should consider when reviewing the submissions for developing clinical practice changes?

What implementation tools may assist you, as the committee leader,, in determining if a study, even one with adequate evidence, provides for a practical transition from research to practice?

Describe some common errors, or pitfalls, that must be avoided when transitioning evidence to practice and some reliable methods for avoidance?

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min