Several committee members have brought studies for review. Each member feels the articles they brought are good because they were published in current respected peer reviewed clinical journals or have been retrieved from clinical practice guidelines.
What are some of the criteria or key elements that you as the committee leader should consider when reviewing the submissions for developing clinical practice changes?
What implementation tools may assist you, as the committee leader,, in determining if a study, even one with adequate evidence, provides for a practical transition from research to practice?
Describe some common errors, or pitfalls, that must be avoided when transitioning evidence to practice and some reliable methods for avoidance?