Use 2 theories (listed) to creat an argument to use each theory as a tool for analyzing an IGO (anyone, except for the 5 listed) and compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about the IGO.

Use 2 theories (listed) to creat an argument to use each theory as a tool for analyzing an IGO (anyone, except for the 5 listed) and compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about the IGO.I need to make a 90%/100% on this paper. If I do not get this what is the refund policy.1. A clear thesis statement and argument with use of examples to support the analysis.2. All references cited in Chicago/Turabian format,including page numbers.3. APA formant, no fewer than 7 and no more than 10 pages (double spaced), 12 pt font.4. Only use references I have provided within the paper.5.Detail instructions: The paper is expected to be an Analytical Graduate Research Paper/Literature Review, I need a formulated argument/thesis. Then I want to use the methodology to explain the thesis, analyze the content (from the sources). And the evidence to support the thesis, why the argument is valid. This paper is about analyzing 2 of these theories of socialization, and or realism, and neoliberal institutionalism then applying to a International Governmental Organization. Additionally, use each one as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO.Bulk of instruction: Use two theories of the listed theories and apply each theory to an IGO of your choice (except for UN, WHO, UNOCH, IMF, PAHO) to use each theory as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO.The Theories are: Socialization (which falls under constructivism), Realism (as discussed by Mearsheimer), and Neoliberal institutionalism (as discussed in Haftel and Thompson (2006)Additional instructions:* The goal is not to identify which one is “best” or “right,” but to use two theories as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO.*Do not conduct outside research, but use as many of the class readings as you can (I have attached these in the bibliography list).* The goal of the instructor is to synthesize our readings and show that I comprehended them.Construction of the paper must encompass the following:OutlineIntro/thesis(research question/argument)Literature ReviewMethodology ExplanationEvidenceAnalysis sectionQualifierCaveatsConclusionExact instructions from the course, “For the final assignment, you will address the following question:Over the last weeks we encountered several IR theories. Let’s consider a sampling of three: socialization (which falls under constructivism), realism (as discussed by Mearsheimer), and neoliberal institutionalism (as discussed in Haftel and Thompson (2006), for example, or Hurd’s introduction, which is attached. This is not an exhaustive list of the readings to use). Your objective is to take two theories of your choice and apply each theory to an IGO of your choice (not the same one you analyzed in your research paper). The goal is not to identify which one is “best” or “right,” but to use each one as a tool for analyzing the IGO and to compare what insights they allow or what limitations they entail when it comes to analyzing something about this IGO. Do not conduct outside research, but use as many of the class readings as you can. The goal is to synthesize your readings and show that you’ve completed and comprehended them. Also, do not recycle content from forums or your research paper; the essay should be a new composition.To address the question, compose an essay of no fewer than 7 and no more than 10 pages (double spaced). You do not need to conduct outside research and should concentrate on using the course readings to display that you’ve completed them and understand their general arguments.All references must be cited in Chicago/Turabian format, which means including page numbers. Be sure to make a clear thesis statement and argument and use examples to support your analysis.Good luck!Reminder:All assignments should be written in Word and uploaded as attachments within the Assignments section of the classroom. Use 12 pt. font and double-space. Be sure to put your name and class information on the document and put your name on the file. Insert page numbers. Assignments will be graded using a rubric appropriate for your class level.References to use:Bibliography/Reading ListBaylis, John. 2010. International and global security. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, ed. John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, 230-245.Benjamin, Dave. 2009. “PROTECTING THE PROTECTORS: NGO ACTION AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT.”. International Journal on World Peace 26, no. 1: 31-50, https://search.proquest.com/docview/219267315?accountid=8289.Copelovitch, Mark S. 2010. “Master or Servant? Common Agency and the Political Economy of IMF Lending.” International Studies Quarterly 54, no. 1: 49-77. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost (accessed December 13, 2015).Grant, Ruth, and Robert Keohane. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 1 (2005). https://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/stable/pdf/30038917.pdf?acceptTC=true.Greenhill, Brian. 2010. The company you keep: International socialization and the diffusion of human rights norms.International Studies Quarterly 54/1: 127-145. EBSCO: https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=48465581&site=ehost-live.Haftel, Yoram, and Alexander Thompson. “The Independence of International Organizations.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, no. 2 (2006). https://www.jstor.org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/stable/pdf/27638486.pdf?acceptTC=true.Hathaway, Oona A. 2007. “Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties?” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (4). Sage Publications, Inc.: 588–621. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27638567.Iriye, Akira. 2002. Global Community: The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press. (accessed December 10, 2015) ProQuest ebrary.Kent, Ann. 2002. China’s international socialization: The role of international organizations. Global Governance 8/3: 343-55. EBSCO: https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=7343806&site=ehost-live.Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. “The false promise of international institutions.” International Security 19, no. 3: 5. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost (accessed January 4, 2016).Moldoveanu, Marcel. 2013. “Regional Integration and International Cooperation: Between Wishes and Reality.” Romanian Economic and Business Review 8(3) 111-119.Saiderman and Auerswald (2012) Comparing CaveatsSchneider, Christina J. 2011. “Weak States and Institutionalized Bargaining Power in International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 2: 331-355. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed December 23, 2015).Serin, Z. Vildan and Beyza Oktay. 2012. Debates on a new international financial system and Turkey’s position within the G20. Journal of Academic Studies 14/54: 15-30. https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=82317379&site=ehost-live.Shannon, Morey, and Boehmke (2010) The influence of international organizations on militarized dispute initiation and durationSteffek, Jens. 2013. Explaining cooperation between IGOs and NGOs: Push factors, pull factors, and policy cycle. Review of International Studies 39(4) 993-1013. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1439785201?accountid=8289 (accessed December 10, 2015).Urbaczka, Adrian and Roland Vaubel. 2013. IMF subsidies, cancellations, and resumptions: New empirical evidence. CATO Journal 33/1: 155-170. https://ezproxy.apus.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=85491861&site=ehost-live.Willet, Peter. “Transnational Actors and International Organizations in Global Politics.” In The Globalization of World Politics, 329. Sixth ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min