Topic: Please define the main interpretive implication for the reader of 2 Samuel 7 and 2 Kings 25 in relationship to the Torah?Order DescriptionThat is, how do these texts in the Former Prophets relate to, connect, interpret, clarify or explain key parts of the Torah? In other words, when the author writes 2 Sam 7 and 2 Kin 25, is he agreeing with the Torah? Or, is he disagreeing with the Torah? Is he changing what the Torah says? Or, is he clarifying what the Torah says? Is there some agreement, complete agreement or complete disagreement between the Torah and these two sections of the Former Prophets?Your thread should begin with your claim (thesis) that answers the questions above. After this first sentence, make your argument by examining 2 Sam 7, 2 Kin 25 and one or more parts of the Torah that show that your thesis (claim) is correct. In this argument, you must defend, clarify and explain your thesis concerning how the author of 2 Sam 7 and 2 Kin 25 understands the Torah.If you use a source, please provide a footnote. If you refer to or quote from the Bible, please use parentheticals rather than a footnote. Any exact words or phrases must be placed in quotes from any source. Please note that your post should be approximately 200–250 words, and your writing style should be formal.Again, the student’s first sentence is the thesis (claim). The rest of the thread should defend, clarify and explain this claim, using both 2 Sam 7 and 2 Kin 25 with one or more parts of the Torah.