Write a five to six (5-6) page paper in which you:

1. Identify and discuss some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
2. List and define the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.
3. Take a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.
4. Provide two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.
5. Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Analyze the complexities of HRIS administration.
• Analyze talent management and its importance to the organization.
• Evaluate the use of the Internet to achieve organizational recruiting, training, and development objectives.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource information systems.
• Write clearly and concisely about human resource information systems using proper writing mechanics.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Points: 180	Assignment 4: e-Recruiting
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1 Identify and discuss some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.   Weight: 20%	Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.	Partially identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.	Satisfactorily identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.	Thoroughly identified and discussed some advantages and disadvantages of using online recruiting.
2. List and define the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.   Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.	Partially listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.	Satisfactorily listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.	Thoroughly listed and defined the four (4) recruiting objectives that impact online recruitment. Select one (1) of the objectives you feel may be most important. Provide an explanation.
3. Take a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.   Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.	Partially took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.	Satisfactorily took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.	Thoroughly took a stand on whether or not the attributes of a website (attractiveness, quality, and ease of use) would affect your motivation to apply for a job at a certain company. Justify your position with specific examples from 2 business websites from which you are familiar.
4.Provide two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.   Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely provided two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.	Partially provided two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.	Satisfactorily provided two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.	Thoroughly provided two examples of assessment testing and list the pros and cons of each assessment testing.
5. 4 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present

Assignment 5: e-Compensation

Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

 

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

1. Assess the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server based or stand-alone PC-based system and then give your opinion on which system would provide the most value to an organization’s stakeholders. Include three (3) facts to support your opinion.
2. Justify the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management, and the employee.
3. Evaluate three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach.
4. Suggest three (3) types of integrated analytic features that are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems.
5. Assess the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools and propose three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.
6. Recommend three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies, etc.) that they receive from outside sources.
7. Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Analyze the complexities of HRIS administration.

• Evaluate the role of HRIS with performance management, compensation, benefits, and payroll.

• Use technology and information resources to research issues in human resource information systems.
• Write clearly and concisely about human resource information systems using proper writing mechanics.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Points: 200	Assignment 5: e-Compensation
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Assess the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-alone PC-based system and then give your opinion on which system would provide the most value to the organization’s stakeholders. Include three (3) facts to support your opinion. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-along PC-based system. Did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion on which system would provide the most value to the organization’s stakeholders. Did not submit or incompletely included three (3) facts to support your opinion.	Partially assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-alone PC-based system. Partially gave your opinion on which system would provide the most value to the organization’s stakeholders. Partially included three (3) facts to support your opinion.	Satisfactorily assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-alone PC-based system. Satisfactorily gave your opinion on which system would provide the most value to the organization’s stakeholders. Satisfactorily included three (3) facts to support your opinion.	Thoroughly assessed the advantages and disadvantages of using a Web-based compensation tool versus a client-server or stand-alone PC-based system. Thoroughly gave your opinion on which system would provide the most value to the organization’s stakeholders. Thoroughly included three (3) facts to support your opinion.
2. Justify the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management, and the employee. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the job- evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management, and the employee.	Partially justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management, and the employee.	Satisfactorily justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management, and the employee.	Thoroughly justified the use of e-Compensation tools in the job-evaluation process from the perspective of HR, management, and the employee.
3. Evaluate three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach.	Partially evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach.	Satisfactorily evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach.	Thoroughly evaluated three (3) benefits and three (3) drawbacks of a centralized approach to managing merit pay programs compared to a more decentralized approach.
4. Suggest three (3) types of integrated analytical features that are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical features that are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems.	Partially suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical features that are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems.	Satisfactorily suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical features that are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems.	Thoroughly suggested three (3) types of integrated analytical features that are needed for compensation planning and decision support in e-Compensation systems.
5. Assess the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools and propose three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely assessed the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools. Did not submit or incompletely proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.	Partially assessed the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools. Partially proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.	Satisfactorily assessed the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools. Satisfactorily proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.	Thoroughly assessed the barriers that prevent organizations from realizing the potential of Web-based internal equity tools. Thoroughly proposed three (3) approaches to overcome those barriers.
6. Recommend three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies, etc.) that receive from outside sources. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely recommended three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they receive from outside sources.	Partially recommended three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they receive from outside sources.	Satisfactorily recommended three (3) strategies that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they receive from outside sources.	Thoroughly recommended three (3) approaches that HR managers can use to evaluate the quality of market data (surveys, benchmark salary studies) that they receive from outside sources.
7. 4 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present