Explore the ideological tendencies of the majority and minority of the current U.S. Supreme Court.

Each discussion answer must be a minimum of 400 words and due tomorrow. Also

No headlines please. Will be checked using turnitin for plagiarism.

#1

Explore the ideological tendencies of the majority and minority of the current U.S. Supreme Court. What is meant by “liberal” or “conservative” judges? Considering the process for selecting Supreme Court justices, is it possible for politics to not play a role in the process? Explain how these ideological/political tendencies shape U.S. Supreme Court opinions.

#2

Analyze a criminal case opinion issued by the U.S. Supreme Court, 2005 or later; explain the issue(s) in the case, the holding of the case, its basis, the number of justices for and against the opinion, and whether it set precedent (i.e., new law) or merely reaffirmed long-standing constitutional values. Identify the justice who authored the opinion, and provide that justice’s ideology. You may choose any case listed below, or locate a criminal U.S. Supreme Court case, 2005 or later, to analyze.

Clark v. Arizona (2006) [Insanity Defense]

Davis v. United States (2011) [Illegal Search Admissible]
Davis v. Washington (2006) [911 Call Admissible at trial?]
Florida v. Powell (2009) [Miranda Warnings]
Giles v. California (2008) [Dead victim’s statements not admissible at trial?]
Graham v. Florida (2010) [Life Sentence for Juvenile Violate Eighth Amendment?]
Greenlaw v. United States (2008) [Can court enhance sentence without prosecutor request?]
Herring v. United States (2009) [Erroneous Search Warrant Require Suppression of Evidence?]
Holmes v. South Carolina (2006) [Exclude Defense Evidence?]
Hudson v. Michigan (2006) [Fourth Amendment “Knock and Announce” Rule]
J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011) [Age Matter for Miranda Warnings?]
Kennedy v. Louisana (2007) [Death penalty for child rape?]
Maryland v. King (2013) [DNA Collected for Data Base for Mere Arrest?]
McDonald v. Chicago (2010) [Gun Rights]
Missouri v. McNeely (2013) [Police Take Blood without a Warrant for DUI?]
Oregon v. Guzek (2006) [Death Sentence Evidence]
Salinas v. Texas (2013) [Fifth Amendment Protect Silence Before Arrest or Miranda?]
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez (2006) [Defendant have right to chosen lawyer?]
United States v. Jones (2012) [Warrantless Tracking Car Violate Fourth Amendment?]
United States v. Williams (2008) [Child Pornography Protected by Free Speech?]
Yeager v. United States(2009) [Double Jeopardy]

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min