Explain does the USA criminal justice system discriminate against people based on race, ethnicity or social class?

Does Our Criminal Justice System Discriminate Against People Based on Race, Ethnicity or Social Class?
1. Introduction
• Racial, social class and ethnic discrepancies still exist in the country’s criminal justice system (“American Sociological Association,” 2007).
• Violence and tensions among the police and certain minority communities still exist.
• The United States criminal justice system still grapples with the skewed perceptions of justice in the system.
• Various studies show that in certain states, black people were more likely to be shot by the police compared to their white counterparts.
• The incidences of discrimination against different minority groups have reduced.
• Current law enforcement policies and regulations assign great emphasis on accountability and professionalism when handling crime.
2. Background
• Different studies have been carried out in different timeframes, environments, and design which results in biased findings.
• Most studies conclude that social class, ethnic and racial parities are still common in the American justice system.
• Various police officers involved in different studies said that their racial bias usually led them to use excessive force when apprehending criminals from certain minority groups.
• Various witnesses state that they saw police officers hurling abuses at suspected criminals from certain ethnic and racial backgrounds (Spohn et al., 2012).
• The practice was more common in the past but current provisions in the constitution prohibit it.
• Racial, social class and ethnic discrimination does occur at certain stages of the system.
• Racial discrimination originated from the adoption of past procedures and regulations that had not been assessed before enactment and implementation.
• Certain decision-making points, arrest, jury selection, bail, sentencing and conviction comprise the most instances of discrimination (Spohn et al., 2012).
• Negative encounters between the police and perceived minority groups are a major cause of arrest.
• Social status and race may be a determining factor in bail application if the offender is able to raise the amount needed to bail him or her out (Reiman & Leighton, 2013).
3. Target groups
• Some reports discovered that the courts had two distinct justice systems, “one for white and a very different one for minorities and the poor.” (Banks, 2013, 45).
• Racial bias has also been reflected among the members of the public where they directed racial slurs and comments towards police officers who were members of selected groups.
• Members of the minority groups had smaller courts sessions convicted by a biased jury.
• Racial, social class and ethnic discrimination is also evident in the processing of juvenile cases.
4. Conclusion
• The most severe effects of discrimination in the criminal justice system are experienced by its victims.
• More research needs to be done to understand the concept of discrimination in the criminal justice system and proper measures put in place to ensure the well-being of the minority groups is maintained.
• In jury selection, many states have established policies and regulations that prohibit the use of an all white jury.
• An all white jury is not representative of the entire population and is therefore susceptible to racial bias (Reiman & Leighton, 1998).

References

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min