Discuss the impact of relational dialogue on resilient leadership in chaotic environments

Abstract

Introduction

For the past millennia and beyond, chaos and wars have ravaged most of the globe, undifferentiating between the developed, developing and underdeveloped countries. The Orient or the Middle East as we know it and specifically the Levant have experienced the most everlasting, relentless and continuous chaos. However despite this somber predicament, individuals, families, organizations, and communities in this region have learned to remain resilient in the face of adversity.  Fundamental cases of organizational resilience emerge from within, highlighting the role Leaders have in spearheading organizations in this environmental dynamic. Practitioner and Scholars alike have devised initiatives and concepts to understand this phenomenon from different angles. As we examine this entanglement, a new paradigm emerges in an attempt to grasp this complexity, out of which a stimulating question arises; how do Leaders sustain resilience in a chaotic environment?

When conducting a comprehensive research on resilient leadership in a chaotic environment, a set of literature emerges in discussing independent variables at play, such as critical reflection, and relational construction. But a gap in the literature fails to link variables together along with the intervening process at play, pressing for a hypothetical question that introduces new dimensions to understanding resilient leadership.

 

Background

The goal of our study here is to help us understand how Resilient Leadership is sustained in Chaotic and unstable environment. The research will shed light on the importance of Relational Construction in the process. Additionally alongside with the analysis of the Case Studies on Relational Construction, we will then be able to draw a set of recommended actions learning moments that Leaders can take to develop Resilience in face of adversity.

Research Topic

The Impact of Relational Dialogue on Resilient Leadership in Chaotic Environments

Hypothesis

We are going to examine whether relational dialogues amongst leaders promote resilient leadership in chaotic organizational environment.

Research Question

  1. How (Does) Relationship Building /construction promote Resilient Leadership in Chaotic (Organizational) environments?
  2. How (Does) Relational Dailogue promote Resilent Leadership in Chatoic Environments?

Conceptual Framework

Theoretical Framework

 
 

Literature Review

  1. Social Constructivism
    1. Relational Self
    2. Relational Building
    3. Relational Dialogue
    4. Relational Leading
    5. Actor Networks
  2. Conflict Resolution Theory
    1. Conflict Resolution
    2. Dialogue
    3. Conflict and Transformation
  3. Chaos Theory
    1. Chaotic Environments
    2. Chaotic Organizations
    3. Leading in Environmental Catastrophes
    4. Leading in Wars
  4. Resilience
    1. Personal Resilience
    2. Leadership Resilience
    3. Organizational Resilience
    4. Environmental Resilience
    5. Resilient Leadership in Chaotic Environments

 

 
 

Research Methods

Case Study

Case Studies around Relational Construction initiatives will be conducted to explore the dynamic Leaders play in the process. Those Case Studies are drawn from several initiatives within the Middle East, where such initiatives hold integral action plans in mediating sustainable business project; and hold round tables for leaders.  Finally will pool the data together to design an interview protocol, and then select a dozen or so Leaders to conduct the semi-structured interviews. The resulting mixed methods research, along with ethnographic tools, case studies, and elements of phenomenology will help us understand weather or not Relational Construction promote Resilient Leadership in Chaotic environments.

 

Grounded Theory

 
 

Timeline

 

References

Argyris, C. (2003). Four steps to chaos. Harvard Business Review, 81(10), 140-140.

Bedi, N., Bishop, M., Hawkins, U., Miller, O., Pedraza, R., Preble, A., & Rico-Rairan, A. (2014). Linking resilience and good governance: A literature review. Anthós, 6(1), 3.

Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375-5393. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563826

Boyatzis, R. E. (2006). An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective. Journal of Management Development, 25(7), 607-623.

Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods Oxford university press.

Bullough, A., & Renko, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times. Business Horizons, 56(3), 343-350. doi:http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2092/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.001

Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011). Organisational resilience: Development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5581-5599. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.563827

Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism Routledge.

Cambel, A. B. (1993). Applied chaos theory : A paradigm for complexity. Boston: Academic Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches Sage publications.

de Oliveira Teixeira, E., & Werther, W. B. (2013). Resilience: Continuous renewal of competitive advantages. Business Horizons, 56(3), 333-342.

Dewey, J. (1948). Reconstruction in philosophy (Enl. ed. with a new introd. by the author. ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.

Fabel, A., & St. John, D. P. (2003). Teilhard in the 21st century : The emerging spirit of earth. Maryknoll, N.Y.: Orbis Books.

Flynn, D. T. (2007). The impact of disasters on small business disaster planning: A case study. Disasters, 31(4), 508-515.

Gergen, K. J. (2009). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction Harvard University Press.

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. (2014). Narrative inquiry: Dialogue beyond disciplines. The Discursive Turn in Social Psychology, , 120.

Gergen, K. (2011). Relational being: Beyond self and community (reprint edition.).

Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being beyond self and community. Retrieved from http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2458/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=472069; Materials specified: Ebook Libraryhttp://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2458/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=472069

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.

Greiner, L. E. (72). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37.

Hersted, L., & Gergen, K. J. (2013). Relational leading Taos Institute Publicatio.

Kalayjian, A., Kanazi, R. L., Aberson, C. L., & Feygin, L. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the psychosocial and spiritual impact of natural disaster. International Journal of Group Tensions, 31(2), 175-186.

Kantur, D., & Iseri-Say, A. (2012). Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework. Journal of Management and Organization, 18(6), 762-773.

Kenneth J Gergen. (1999). An invitation to social construction Sage.

King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research Princeton University Press.

Levy, D. (1994). Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 167-178. doi:10.1002/smj.4250151011

Lissack, M., & Gunz, H. (Eds.). (1999). Managing complexity in organizations : A view in many directions. Westport, Conn.: Quorum.

Mamouni Limnios, E. A., Mazzarol, T., Ghadouani, A., & Schilizzi, S. G. M. (2014). The resilience architecture framework: Four organizational archetypes. European Management Journal, 32(1), 104-116. doi:http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2092/10.1016/j.emj.2012.11.007

Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization : Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systems. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach Sage.

McCallum, S., & David O’Connell. (2009). Social capital and leadership development. Leadership & Org Development J, 30(2), 152-166. doi:10.1108/01437730910935756

McNamee, S., & Hosking, D. M. (2012). Research and social change. A Relational,

McNamee, S., & Hosking, D. M. (2012). Research and social change: A relational constructionist approach Routledge.

McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1999). Relational responsibility resources for sustainable dialogue. Retrieved from http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2060/id/10586530; Materials specified: ebraryhttp://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2060/id/10586530

Nonaka, I. (1988). Creating organizational order out of chaos: Self-renewal in. California Management Review, 30(3), 57.

Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203-223.

Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattila, H. (2014). Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises—an empirical study of swedish textile and clothing SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, Part B(0), 410-428. doi:http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2092/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.031

Peterson, K., & Rutledge, M. (2014). Creating adaptive leaders and organizations. Od Practitioner, 46(2)

Powley, E. H. (2009). Reclaiming resilience and safety: Resilience activation in the critical period of crisis. Human Relations, 62(9), 1289-1326.

Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2010). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation Sage Publications.

Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2015). Research methods in practice: Strategies for description and causation (Third Edition ed.) Sage Publications.

Richardson, W., & Wildman, W. J. (Eds.). (1996). Religion & science : History, method, dialogue. New York: Routledge.

Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147(1), 598-611.

Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Integrated business continuity and disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilience. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 261-273. doi:http://proxy.library.upenn.edu:2092/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.055

Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data : Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research : Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Styhre, A. (2002). Non-linear change in organizations: Organization change management informed by complexity theory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(6), 343-351.

Thietart, R. A., & Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos theory and organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19.

Thietart, R., & Forgues, B. (1997). Action, structure and chaos. Organization Studies, 18(1), 119.

Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice-told tale : Feminism, postmodernism, and ethnographic responsibility. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Zolli, A., & Healy, A. M. (2012). Resilience : Why things bounce back (1st Free Press hardcover ed.). New York: Free Press.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min