Discuss how the Bible informs our understanding of the concepts of investments and wealth creation, asset/product diversification, and financial risk management.

Carefully study Ecclesiastics 11: 1-4 and, using at least three other biblical/scriptural references, discuss how the Bible informs our understanding of the concepts of investments and wealth creation, asset/product diversification, and financial risk management. Submit a 3- to 4-page (excluding the cover page) summary using MS Word in APA style.

Also, note the following correct way to cite a biblical reference in APA Style:

Parenthetical Citations:

For your first citation, identify the version which you used. Example: (John 3:16 New Revised Standard Version).
As part of a sentence: Example: “In Psalm 36:1 (New Jerusalem Bible), David…”
After this, only include the scripture reference, unless you switch versions.
Reference/Citation Page:

Well-known books such as the Bible do not need to be included on the reference page, unless a professor requires you to do so. You are not required to do so in this paper.

(Source: Information taken from Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th ed., 2009, section 6.18 as referenced on https://www.messiah.edu/murraylibrary/guides/bible_cite.pdf (Links to an external site.))

Rubric
Title:
Biblical Research Paper
Biblical Research Paper
Criteria Ratings Pts
Flagged_question-e2565888dd Content & Development
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
Excellent: The content is comprehensive, accurate, and addresses the assignment with the required minimum number of biblical references. Ideas are presented in a clear and understandable manner with appropriate logic. All references are complete and accurate. Biblical principles are clearly explained, and conclusion and/or recommendations are meaningful.
60 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Good: The content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Ideas are clear, but more information is needed. Major points are addressed, but not well supported or have illogical conclusions. Calculations are complete. Recommendations are fairly meaningful and biblical principles are somewhat explained.
38 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Fair: The content is incomplete, and major points are not clear. Calculations are incomplete and/or inaccurate. Recommendations are not very good. Biblical principles are not clearly explained.
25 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Inadequate: The content is incomplete. Major points are unclear. Calculations are incomplete and inaccurate. Recommendations and biblical principles are nonexistent.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
pts
60 pts

Additional Comments

Flagged_question-e2565888dd Organization
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
Excellent: Information is presented in a logical, interesting sequence that is easy to follow.
20 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Good: Information is presented in a logical sequence, but the flow of the paper could be improved. Transitions between paragraphs are missing.
2 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Fair: Information is presented in an illogical sequence, making it very difficult to follow.
1 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Inadequate: There is no real sequence of information.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
pts
20 pts

Additional Comments

Flagged_question-e2565888dd Format
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
Excellent: APA format is followed exactly. The paper meets the specific guidelines as outlined in the syllabus.
10 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Good: APA format is followed most of the time. The paper meets most of specific guidelines as outlined in the syllabus.
9 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Fair: APA format has errors. The paper meets some of the specific guidelines as outlined in the syllabus.
6 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
Inadequate: APA format not followed. The paper meets few of the specific guidelines as outlined in the syllabus.
0 pts
Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating
pts
10 pts

Additional Comments

Flagged_question-e2565888dd Punctuation, Grammar, and Spelling
view longer description
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min