What you need to write: Discussion of the lab report.

I will upload part of the report (Introduction and Method) and a separate document containing result figures and tables later, please read through them and finish the report by writing the discussion of the results. Please note that the introduction was poorly written so please read the comments of my introduction and avoid referring and or supporting the discussion with irrelevant literature reviews from the introduction (basically, you can put anything you think is relevant, just disregard what I put in the introduction).

What is required for the discussion:
– it should be the opposite of introduction: start out narrow and broaden it out.
-Begin it by restating the hypotheses, and whether or not these were supported (Noted the commentary for the hypotheses, it was said my 3 hypotheses were not clearly and accurately stated so you might want to rephrase them properly…)
-Should discuss the implications of the results in terms of previous literature (As I have said before, just put any literature reviews you think as relevant, but please at least include Boeker et al. 2012 as this is the one given to us.
-Following this discuss any limitations of current research.
-End it with future directions (where is the field going now).

I hope everything is clear, I will also upload the methodology of the experiment if you are confused what the experiment is actually doing. I will also include an example of a good report so you can see what I expect for the discussion. If you cannot access the references please let me know.

Formatting is APA 6th style.