Conflict Resolution in 6 Simple Easy Steps
As a mediator, I wish that more people were aware of this very simple and highly successful method to resolve various types of conflicts. Dr. Byrne, will explain 6 steps that you can easily remember. This works! You can apply this in this assignment as to how you could resolve education conflicts with parents, pother teachers, the principal, etc. Again, you may use this as a reference.
Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSGy5yvC0hM&index=1&list=PLXerNiozYvi_-Oc39NxTgMuJym2w4ESVx
Connect, Collect, Collaborate and Communicate are the four major ways to plan and establish an excellent co-teaching model in your school. The following web site will assist you in this week’s assignment by introducing you to co-teaching competencies and will also provide a co-teaching observation checklist so that you will know what to look for in your own co-teaching experience and in observing other teachers. Don’t miss this.
!http://www.coteachsolutions.com/www.2TeachLLC.com
References
Booth, B. (2013, April 25). Bill Nye the science guy: Inclusive classrooms [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffjINtZ-3QE
Education Week (2011, October 14). Co-teaching is a marriage [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pnxst7dkLk
Grietgriet. (2011). DSCN7038.JPG [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.morguefile.com/archive/display/694316
James Madison University. (2013, September 6). Co-Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.jmu.edu/coe/esc/consortium/Co-Teaching.shtm
Marston, N. (2014). NEA – 6 steps to successful co-teaching. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/tools/6-steps-to-successful-co-teaching.html
Ted. (2012, April). Sherry Turkle: Connected, but alone? [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/sherry_turkle_alone_together.html
Windle, R., & Warren, S. (n.d.). Collaborative problem solving: Steps in the process. Retrieved from http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/section5.cfm
Week 5 – Assignment
Everyone Wants What’s Best, So How Can “Best” Be So Different
In this assignment you will demonstrate your understanding of the following learning objectives:
- Analyze ways to create a collaborative school culture to promote professional growth and leadership;
- Determine some of the causes of education-based conflict.
- Evaluate problem solving and negotiation strategies to resolve education-based conflict.
- Recognize the importance of knowing personal strengths and weaknesses in conflict resolution.
- Justify the collaborative role of transition team members who actively participate in transition meetings.
Additionally, the assignment represents your mastery of Course Learning Outcomes 1, 2, & 3.
Providing tools for academic success to students with disabilities is a collaborative effort. Sometimes however, individuals within the collaborative team face conflict due to a strong emotional or professional investment from a particular member. Examples of education-based conflict include disagreements over the allocation of limited resources and funding, differing curriculum delivery methods, class behavior management styles, misinterpreted conversations (due to cultural differences, communication styles, personal or professional backgrounds, and other differences), and misunderstanding of professional roles, school policy, and other school or district-based guidelines. Chapter 9 in your Murawski and Spencer (2011) text outlines the causes of conflict and how to problem-solve through negotiation strategies with peers and in a collaborative team setting.
Instructions:
Content
The collaboration steps, as defined by Windle and Warren’s (n.d.) Collaborative Problem Solving: Steps in the Process, are listed below. Use the headings named in this section within your paper.
- Before the Meeting – Interests and Options (1 point): Windle and Warren (n.d.) suggest that interests are the “underlying need, want, or desire that we are trying to satisfy with our position (solution)” Consider that statement, then:
- Identify each team member’s interest in Lily’s post-graduation goals, including options that may be available given each team member’s point of view.
- During the Meeting – Perception/Emotions (1 point): Remember that by sharing why your perception is important and relevant, the team will understand why each member has a certain perspective. In this section of your assignment:
- Hypothesize each team member’s perceptions and the emotions tied to those perceptions, including an explanation that supports your rationale for the perception and associated emotions.
- During the Meeting – Define the Issue (2 points): Windle and Warren (n.d.) suggest that an issue “may be defined as an element of the dispute that represents a party’s need or interest.” Consider that statement, then:
- Identify one issue that the team will discuss, including a supporting rationale for your choice of this issue over others.
- During the Meeting – Generate Options/ Brainstorming (2 points): Windle and Warren (n.d.) suggest that “Most of us are not accustomed to inventing options and we slip easily into critiquing and judging as soon as possibilities are put on the board.” Consider this statement, then:
- Using each team member’s ideas, perceptions, and the overall issue, describe at least five options that may satisfy the interest of all the team members, including a rationale for your chosen options.
- During the Meeting – Objective Criteria/ Reach Agreement (1 point): After you have generated a list of brainstorming options, in this section of your assignment you will:
- Decide which option is the most agreeable to everyone, including a justification of how this agreement meets each team member’s interests, options, and perceptions.
- During the Meeting – Self-Reflection (2 points): Using what you learned about yourself from the Week 1 self-assessment and other knowledge you have acquired throughout the course:
- Write a self-reflection about the strengths and weaknesses you have in relation to the case study for this assignment. Be sure to consider what you know about how you can leverage your personal strengths as a team leader in the transition meeting in the role of special educator.
Lily Case Study
Lily was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome at age eight when she started displaying ”typical behaviors” including misunderstanding social cues with girls her age, perseverating on Sponge Bob cartoons, and holding her ears every time a bell would ring to change classes. She has always been educated in an inclusive general classroom using the collaborative consultation model, receiving pull-out SLP (Speech & Language Pathologist) services where she learned social skills and how to communicate with peers. Lily’s teacher says that she loves writing stories about her favorite cartoons and has always loved Sponge Bob. She is an outstanding artist and works well independently because she gets overwhelmed very easily in a group. Her least favorite subject is social studies as she has a very difficult time understanding past events as the concepts are too abstract.
Now that she has turned 16, Lily’s transition team is meeting for the first time to discuss a post-graduation plan. They need to set realistic goals, discuss interest inventories, and evaluate Lily’s options. Included in this meeting is the lead special education coordinator, Lily’s mother and father (who are divorced), the general educator, the school psychologist, and the speech and language pathologist. Her past IEP meetings have been very challenging; although everyone has her best interest at heart, they have differing opinions of how “best interest” is defined. Lily’s parents want her to go to a 4-year college with a focus on computer animation. The special education coordinator supports Lily’s wish to work at a daycare center as an assistant, because she really enjoys children and doesn’t feel her usual social anxiety around them. The general educator and speech and language pathologist at this school don’t know her well enough to provide post-graduation input. The school psychologist says that Lily’s interest inventory identifies that her area of strength is in an engineering field working independently with concrete concepts.
Written Communication
- Page Requirement (1 point): Five to seven pages, not including the title and reference pages.
- APA Formatting (1 point): Use APA formatting consistently throughout the assignment.
- Syntax and Mechanics (1 point): Display meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.
- Source Requirement (1 point): Reference five scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook that provide compelling evidence to support your ideas. All sources on the references page need to be used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
ANSWER
body preview (0 words)
file1.doc preview (1601 words)
xxx xxxx xx MERGEFORMAT �8� Running Head: DISCUSSION
xxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx Name
Institution
xxx
Ways xx creating x collaborative school xxxxxxx that results xx professional growth
xxxxx are various xxxx that xxx be xxxx to xxxxxx collaboration xxxxxxx the teacher xxx xxx cultures xxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx result xx professional xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx good leadership. The models or organizational xxx help I xxxxxxxxxxxx of collaboration xxx xx not xxxxxxxxx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx ways xxxx can be used xx the xxxxxxxx xx the xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx include the xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx et al. xxxxx
xxxxxxxx a truly shared xxxx xxx xxxxxxx
The xxxxxx xx xxx schools xxxxxx be shared xx the xxxxxxx of the xxxxxxxxx xxx the teacher. That will enable xxxxxxxxxxxxx as all teachers xxx xxx xxxxxxxxx at large xxxx xx xxxxxxx towards xxxxxxxxx one specific goal. When xxxxxxxx and the xxxxxxxxx have xxx same vision, xxxx xxxx both xxxxxxxxxxx xxx work xx one xxxxx xxxxxx the same xxxxx xxxxxx xxx
– – – more text follows – – –
|
Buy this answer |
Try it before you buy it |
Order Management
Premium Service
- 100% Custom papers
- Any delivery date
- 100% Confidentiality
- 24/7 Customer support
- The finest writers & editors
- No hidden charges
- No resale promise
Format and Features
- Approx. 275 words / page
- All paper formats (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian)
- Font: 12 point Arial/Times New Roman
- Double and single spacing
- FREE bibliography page
- FREE title page
0% Plagiarism
We take all due measures in order to avoid plagiarisms in papers. We have strict fines policy towards those writers who use plagiarisms and members of QAD make sure that papers are original.
