Arguably, both Nooteboom and Nonaka/Zhu see learning as significant to competitive advantage and long-term viable organizations. Identify what you think is the (1) single most significant similarity between the two books in regard to learning and the (2) single most significant difference in how the two books view learning.

Part 1: Arguably, both Nooteboom and Nonaka/Zhu see learning as significant to competitive advantage and long-term viable organizations. Identify what you think is the (1) single most significant similarity between the two books in regard to learning and the (2) single most significant difference in how the two books view learning. Explain your answers.

Part 2: In your opinion, what is the single most critical addition the Groot& Homan article brings to the discussion of learning (that is, what is the most significant aspect of learning that Groot & Homan discuss that may not be directly addressed or well explicated in either Nooteboom or Nonaka/Zhu)? Provide a rationale for your answer.

Please refer to the articles mentioned. Find them online I do not have copies to upload.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min