In the article Is Terrorism Distinctively Wrong? on p.248-253 of EE, Lionel McPherson presents an argument about the justifiability of terrorism. Your task in the second paper is to present, explain, and critically evaluate McPherson’s argument.

First, read the article carefully to determine what McPherson’s main conclusion is. Once you have the main conclusion, use the steps outlined in Section 4 of the logic page to formulate a valid version of the main argument.

http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/mjwinter/phil115/logic.htm

Use McPherson’s article to provide support for each premise.

In the second section of the paper, provide a brief critique of the argument. Which premise or premises are questionable? Why? Do any ideas from this course count against the premises?

The general guidelines and grading criteria for the paper are here:
http://courseweb.stthomas.edu/mjwinter/phil214/analyticpapers.html