345SAM Assignment Brief

345SAM Assignment BriefPage 1 of 6Faculty of Business, Environment and SocietyAssignment BriefModule Title: Project Managementfor BusinessAssignmentNumberSemester 2Module Code: 345SAM Assignment Title Migrating IT service to the“cloud”.Submission Date: 26th February 2016 Module Leader Marie Sams, David EllisSubmissionTime and Place:Submission throughTurnitin ONLY 23:55Module Team Amritpal Slaich,Kasim Randeree, Sorin PipercaModule learning outcomes being assessed1. Evaluate current issues in project management and its application in the businessenvironment.2. Critically evaluate different tools and techniques used in project management3. Assess the impact of hard and soft skills on the management of a variety of differentprojects.Assignment InformationA Coventry-based advertising agency, employing around 40 staff, have experienced anumber of recent successes and are planning to expand their business to meet the needs oftheir growing customer base and to enable them to respond to opportunities forinternational contracts in Europe, the Middle East and Asia.The company’s IT network, maintained in-house by an IT manager and technician, hasreached its designed capacity, and will not be capable of supporting the needs of theirexpanding workforce. With the increasing international focus of their business, the need forstaff to work away from the office (for example when visiting customers) and the need torespond quickly to customer requests, the company are planning to replace their in-house ITserver network with a remotely hosted “cloud” based service which provides the latestoffice and creative media applications. Not only should this provide the necessary capacityand options for growth, it is also hoped that reliability and performance will be improved,thereby increasing staff productivity.You have been appointed as the project manager to oversee the specification andprocurement of the new remotely hosted IT service and the migration of employees’345SAM Assignment BriefPage 2 of 6accounts and data from the current system to the new system. Your first task is to preparea project initiation document (2000 words), drawing on appropriate project managementtheory and frameworks, to present to the company’s board of directors for approval. Theplan should consider the following aspects of the project:• The project’s scope.• An initial assessment of stakeholders and recommendations on how thesestakeholders should be managed to maximise the chance of achieving the project’sobjectives.• An initial assessment of risks and opportunities presented by the project and theresponse strategies proposed.• The proposed project organization.• An outline project plan (Gantt chart) showing the main tasks and significantmilestones. The Gantt chart needs to show a minimum of 10 tasks.There is no need for you to prepare an outline business case and project budget, as this willbe prepared by a colleague, based on the Gantt chart and budgetary estimates fromsuppliers.The design of your project initiation document should take in to consideration both the softand hard skills necessary to ensure the project’s success.StructureYour assignment should be presented as a report, using the following structure:Project Initiation Document sectionIncluded in word countProject ScopeYesProject Stakeholder AssessmentYesRisk and Opportunity AssessmentYesProject OrganisationYesProject PlanYesReference listNo345SAM Assignment BriefPage 3 of 6The word count for this assignment is 2000 words. There is a 10% word limit tolerance.(Maximum/minimum range: 1800 to 2200 words.)Tables, diagrams, appendices and references are omitted from the overall word count:Sections contributing to the word count are indicated. You may also include tables,diagrams and models. These do not count towards the word count. Ensure that all tables,diagrams and models are labelled, include a citation and are discussed in the text.Appendices and reference list are also not included in the word count.You must state the number of words used on the front cover of the assignment.Source materialYou are required to research and apply project management theory in order to successfullycomplete this assignment. In order to pass, you will need to use a minimum of 10 separate sources,including a minimum of 3 textbooks and 3 journal articles.How to submit your assessmentThe essay must be submitted via Turnitin by 23.55 on 26/02/2016. No paper copies are required.You can access the Turnitin link through the module web.• Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Turnitin.• All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason (seebelow) will be given a mark of zero. Please note that a non-submission is not the same as afailed submission; a failed submission counts as an attempt whereas an absent mark doesnot necessarily allow you to resit the coursework.• Short deferrals (extensions) of up to three calendar weeks can only be given for genuine“force majeure” and medical reasons, not for bad planning of your time. Please note thattheft, loss, or failure to keep a back-up file, are not valid reasons. The short deferral must beapplied for on or before the submission date. You can apply for a short deferral bysubmitting an Examination/ Coursework Deferral Application Form. Application Forms alongwith the supporting evidence should go to the relevant Student Support Office (WMG01).For a longer delay in submission a student may apply for a long deferral.• Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.• Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarismchecking websites.345SAM Assignment BriefPage 4 of 6GUIDELINES AND BACKGROUND TO THIS ASSIGNMENTThis assessment will assess all of the module learning outcomes and makes up 50% of the overallmodule mark.Word Count LimitYour word count includes in text citations but not the final references or appendices. If you are more than 10%over or under the word count limit you will receive a 10% penalty.The contents of your References and Appendices are not normally given a specific mark (though they willcontribute to your overall mark, as detailed in the assessment criteria). We therefore recommend that youonly use Appendices for supporting material and not for the substantive part of your work.PlagiarismAs part of your study you will be involved in carrying out research and using this when writing up yourcoursework. It is important that you correctly acknowledge someone else’s writing or thoughts and that youdo not attempt to pass this off as your own work. Doing so is known as plagiarism. It is not acceptable to copyfrom another source without acknowledging that it is someone else’s writing or thinking. This includes usingparaphrasing as well as direct quotations. You are expected to correctly cite and reference the works ofothers. The Centre for Academic Writing provides documents to help you get this right. If you are unsure,please visit www.coventry.ac.uk/caw.Turnitin includes a plagiarism detection system and assessors are experienced enough to recognise plagiarismwhen it occurs. Copying another student’s work, using previous work of your own or copying large sectionsfrom a book or the internet are examples of plagiarism and carry serious consequences. Please familiariseyourself with the CU Harvard Reference Style (on Moodle) and use it correctly to avoid a case of plagiarism orcheating being brought. Again, if you are unsure, please contact the Centre for Academic Writing or a memberof the course team.Return of Marked WorkYou can expect to have marked work returned to you two weeks after the submission deadline. Marks andfeedback will be provided online. As always, marks will have been internally moderated only, and willtherefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner hascompleted his / her review.Marks DistributionMarks will be allocated as follows:Coursework element Mark splitResearch and selection of project management theory to support the assignment 25%Appropriate application of project management techniques 40%Clarity and credibility of proposals 15%Gantt chart 10%Structure, layout and presentation, including spelling and grammar 5%CU Harvard referencing and use of in-text citations 5%In addition to the above marks breakdown, it is useful for students to understand what constitutes apoor, average, good and excellent piece of work. Please refer to the guidelines below:345SAM Assignment BriefPage 5 of 6Assessment CriteriaMarkrangeGuidelines70 –100%In order to secure a mark in this range, a candidate must submit an outstanding answer thatcould hardly be bettered. In addition to the criteria identified below for a mark between 70-85%,an answer scoring a mark of 85-100% would show an excellent level of understanding andcritical/analytic skills and originality. For example, such an answer would include new insightsinto Project Management which are not drawn from the literature but from the student’s owncritical thinking, and which add something to the existing literature.An essay in this range will demonstrate a strong understanding of theories, concepts and issuesrelating to Project Management. There will be evidence of wide-ranging reading from a varietyof valid sources (as described and presented in the marking criteria for 60-69%).The assignment must be written in a clear, well-structured way with a coherent and seamlessflow and show evidence of independent, critical thought. It must show extensive relevantreading on the subject and intelligent use of the material to present a well-balanced and wellarguedassignment. For example, the student will have considered a range of relevant issues andbe able to assess the strength and weaknesses of various approaches/arguments and putforward a confident and articulate view of their own.60 – 69%An essay in this mark range will demonstrate a very good understanding of the requirements ofthe assignment and of theories, concepts and issues relating to Project Management. Anassignment in this percentage range will include a balanced discussion of issues central to thequestion, how these are addressed by different authors or sources and some critical thinking intotheir relative merits or shortcomings.The answer will be contain few errors and little, if any, irrelevant material. It will show evidenceof reading from a variety of sources (i.e. more than 10) but not so many sources that thediscussion loses focus and becomes unclear or irrelevant. All sources should be of academicmerit (e.g. books, journals, reports, media publications). Unreferenced material and informationfrom non-credible internet sources should not be included.All sources must be included and properly referenced in the reference list. The assignment willbe well-organised and clearly written/presented overall.50 – 59%The answer will demonstrate a good understanding of relevant theories, concepts and issuesrelating to Project Management but also some areas of limited understanding or analysis.The assignment will show evidence of research, but will, or example, provide a narrative accountrather analyse and evaluate material. The assignment may be quite general in part. Some errorsmay be present and some irrelevant material may be included.The essay may not be particularly well-structured, and/or clearly presented and contain somespelling mistakes and grammatical errors. A few sentences may be unclear.40 – 49%A mark within this percentage range will be given to an essay which:– shows some limited basic understanding of the subject but is incomplete. For example, if itanswers one part of a question but not the rest.– makes only very general statements345SAM Assignment BriefPage 6 of 6MarkrangeGuidelines– includes some factual errors or misunderstandings e.g. confusion between differentcompanies or misuse of certain key terms.– shows limited use of material with limited reading/research on the topic and includes only avery small number of references, not all of which are included in the references– includes spelling mistakes, is poorly structured with no clear argument and grammar mistakesmaking it difficult to understand.– includes some irrelevant material.35 – 39%A mark within this percentage range will be given to an assignment which, for example:– includes only a limited amount of relevant material.– shows little evidence of reading/research on the topic. For example, the essay includes onlyvery few references, and relies only on material or case studies used during the course.– shows only a very basic understanding of the subject.– is poorly presented, with an incomplete reference list.– has a poor structure and does not flow e.g. if there is no conclusion or new facts areintroduced in the conclusion rather than introduction or main discussion.– contains some fundamental errors.20 – 34%0 – 19%A poor fail on this assignment means the assignment submitted:– shows a poor understanding of theories, concepts and issues relating to Project Managementand to the learning outcomes detailed in this document.– contains some or many fundamental errors and misunderstandings of the academic or othermaterial used.– uses literature or other material which is largely irrelevant or has no academic value– is poorly structured and poorly presented. For example, sentences may be hard to understandand contain many spelling or grammatical mistakes.– contains no or few references.Work within this mark range shows a complete failure to meet the requirements of theassignment. A mark in this range will be given for an essay which:– bears no link to the question chosen and shows very little or no knowledge or understandingof any of the theories, concepts and issues relating to Project Management.– contains no references and/or evidence of relevant reading.– shows little understanding of the requirements of the assignment and only avagueknowledge of the subject area.– includes numerous fundamental errors in the understanding or presentation of the materialdiscussed. There is a general lack of evidence and what is provided is mostly incorrect and/orirrelevant.– is poorly structured and poorly presented. Spelling and grammar are poor. Many sentencesare incomprehensible.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min