Peer evaluations have proven to be one of the most beneficial and impactful methods of improvement. It is also one of the hardest things to do, as a peer evaluator walks a thin line between constructive criticism and harsh opinion. Nevertheless, you might be surprised at how helpful the advice of your classmates can be.
For this assignment, you are to evaluate the rough drafts of two different classmates based on the provided rubric below.
To retrieve these rough drafts, you will need to return to “The Rough Draft” forum in week five of this course.
Parameters:
- Each of these reviews (attached) should have your feedback provided in a Word or Open Office Document. Utilize the provided rubric (linked above) and include this with your constructive feedback, incorporating specific, positive remarks as well as helpful suggestions so your peer is able to see you genuinely evaluated their rough draft.
The following rubric will be used by the instructor to grade your reviews:
Grading Criteria Assignments | Maximum Points |
Original Rough Draft submitted in week 5 | 10 |
Ensures criteria for final project are incorporated | 30 |
Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts | 20 |
Clearly presents constructive feedback – positive replies and suggestions for improvement | 30 |
Uses proper mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, spelling, APA structure and incorporates peer review rubric | 10 |
Total | 100 |
Premium Service
- 100% Custom papers
- Any delivery date
- 100% Confidentiality
- 24/7 Customer support
- The finest writers & editors
- No hidden charges
- No resale promise
Format and Features
- Approx. 275 words / page
- All paper formats (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago/Turabian)
- Font: 12 point Arial/Times New Roman
- Double and single spacing
- FREE bibliography page
- FREE title page
0% Plagiarism
We take all due measures in order to avoid plagiarisms in papers. We have strict fines policy towards those writers who use plagiarisms and members of QAD make sure that papers are original.
