Does the nature of terrorist activities and attacks extend the range of options permissible both morally and ethically to the threatened or attacked nation? Analyze and evaluate the ethical and moral considerations to justify a position for or against for using an extended range of options to meet national security objectives. Address any thresholds you may apply ( just war criteria, Patriot act ( ), etc. ). please let me know any questions you have in order to deliver a good paper. Ethical considerations of at least 3 different historical examples.